Fresh claims arise where new evidence or changed circumstances create a realistic prospect of success that was not previously considered. Persecution experts assess whether new information changes the persecution risk analysis for the appellant's specific profile.
Changed country conditions, new targeting of the appellant's group, or newly documented state protection failures may support a fresh claim. Expert reports must clearly identify what has changed since the previous decision and how this affects the persecution analysis.
Persecution experts can provide updated analysis where the original decision did not adequately address Convention grounds, state protection, or non-state actor persecution, or where subsequent events have altered the risk profile.
Related Persecution Types
Frequently Asked Questions
When is expert evidence needed for a fresh claim?
Expert evidence supports fresh claims where new country conditions, changed targeting of the appellant's group, or newly available information alters the persecution risk analysis. The expert must clearly identify what has changed and how it affects the Convention ground and state protection analysis.
Can a persecution expert challenge a previous tribunal finding?
A persecution expert provides independent analysis based on current evidence. Where a previous decision failed to apply persecution methodology correctly or relied on outdated country conditions, updated expert evidence can support a fresh claim or further submission.